Not necessarily, it is often enough to exploit their dfendant body. Their strength is rmunrer srieux of work, then use the results obtained in mechanical communication. In the case of tobacco, it is the inner pollution radon through the gntiques prdispositions and food. Among other factors should be suspected as tobacco, more industrial will use.
Through my enqute, I identified a dozen known, thanks documents rests long secrets, they actually peru money by societies notch lies Philip Morris. How? Not much, in view of verses are in the United States: outside of a particular case, which has received hundreds of thousands of francs in Switzerland (he's dead now), it was around of tens of thousands of francs era. Their work was part of the lectures but also criticize the result of other researchers. . . Critics obviously not spontaneous and intended counterbalance ngatifs rsultats for the tobacco industry.
The laboratory of the neurobiologist who t director of Inserm Research Unit, has indeed t financed 2.8 million francs between 1989 and 2000. Today he says he has never worked on nicotine cigarette with money, but he nevertheless sign a lot of papers on this topic. Similarly, there is no evidence that it would, in addition, reu money as private consultant. However, I note that he has constantly held that both speeches were inconsistent with the scientific literature and in accordance with the official pronouncements of the tobacco industry.
In 2009, he participated in a study devoted to the mechanisms of nicotine addiction and leads on rats. And it does spread by the press service of the CNRS a communiqu whose main message is that nicotine replacement are not effective. However, the subject of his article is not at all that the. Worse, he said a study the opposite of what it forward on the issue of substitutes!
They have managed a real tour de force. In infiltrating most intergovernmental organizations, industry like Monsanto are both judge and jury. Take ICPBR a completely unknown organism, informal, without ral legal existence. Hundred "promote and coordinate research on plants and bees of any kind," he gathers honntes scientists and others in the industry. His role: building exprimentaux protocols To check the toxicity of insecticides and then propose EUROPEAN Agency. And as the consensus now serves Grail, these recommendations are forcment niveles the bottom.
It has already already well began, more so when there is mlent of economic or political issues. In this regard, the manufacturers of aspartame activism is phenomenal: in recent years, dozens and dozens of studies have t published with their support, all of which conclude the harmlessness of this component.
Without hesitation, asbestos. Voil a product that you hundreds of thousands of people around the world, including France. Rsultat? Nothing. No conviction in our country. Yet for years the dangers of asbestos involved, the name of the responsible one yet knows we know, we know how scientists t achets, boxes of communication that exercise takes place are identified. All this leaves a deep sense of injustice and gchis.